| 157524604704_532060007504 | Sevrin Robstad |
|
|
|
| |
| 148029314227_578260007558 | Message not availabl |
|
|
|
| |
| 154720384914_596360007285 | Molle Bestefich |
|
|
|
| |
| 183321004337_509160007962 | Francois Barre |
|
On Monday July 17, quackyo@xxxxxxxx wrote:
I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke
down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it upnrunning again
I did |
|
| |
| 198527924537_546260007055 | Francois Barre |
|
|
|
| |
| 187720594515_558160007886 | Tuomas Leikola |
|
|
|
| |
| 108428604817_531260007047 | Jeff Breidenbach |
|
|
|
| |
| 187021884086_578460007622 | Jeff Breidenbach |
|
|
|
| |
| 106829834723_540560007175 | Bill Davidsen |
|
|
|
| |
| 136720584968_590560007451 | Neil Brown |
|
Hi all,
I have a RAID6 array where a disk went bad. I removed the old disk, put in an
identical one, and repartitioned the new disk. I am now trying to add the
new partition to the array, but I |
|
| |
| 196023984511_547460007890 | Neil Brown |
|
Thanks for the reply, Neil. Here is my version:
[root@paul log]# mdadm --version
mdadm - v2.3.1 - 6 February 2006
This is a somewhat production system, running Fedora Core 5. Official
packages co |
|
| |
| 136020634750_517660007391 | Neil Brown |
|
Please, please! I am dead in the water!
To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 system, using /dev/hd[acdeg]
2 and /dev/sd[ab]2. /dev/hdd went bad so I replaced the drive and tried to
ad |
|
| |
| 122422454579_531060007729 | Paul Waldo |
|
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Neil Brown wrote:
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Please, please! I am dead in the water!
To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 |
|
| |
| 193320964712_565560007786 | Paul Waldo |
|
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
At this point, Id just be happy to be able to get the degraded array back up
and running. Is there any way to do that? Thanks!
mdadm --as |
|
| |
| 183028694845_579860007366 | Paul Waldo |
|
|
|
| |
| 124927324764_576060007743 | Paul Waldo |
|
|
|
| |
| 165025674806_539960007181 | Dan Graham |
|
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Here is the dmesg output. No log files are created with the FC5 rescue disk.
Thanks!
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:59, Neil Brown wrote:
|
|
| |
| 179029674426_536860007455 | Paul Clements |
|
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dan Graham wrote:
Hello;
I have an existing, active ext3 filesystem which I would like to convert to
a RAID 1 ext3 filesystem with minimal down time. After casting about |
|
| |
| 109722104551_580960007052 | Robert Heinzmann |
|
Paul Clements wrote:
Is 16 blocks a large enough area?
Maybe. The superblock will be between 64KB and 128KB from the end of the
partition. This depends on the size of the partition:
|
|
| |
| 159526954922_544060007694 | Paul Waldo |
|
Still no joy after zeroing the superblock, Mikael. :-(
[root@paul ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/hdd2
/dev/hdd2:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : 2e316d9e:20cac82a |
|
| |
| 180627424426_557060007632 | Neil Brown |
|
Hi i have small problem when i booting i have md1 as /boot md2 as swap
and md3 as / (root) and when it come to md3 it say something like "md3
has no identity information" i cant read it |
|
| |
| 131221504198_511760007942 | linuxmania lizhi |
|
A client of mine desperately wants a Dell solution rather than a
self-build. They are looking at an external Dell box with 15 x 500GB SATA
drives in it and a Dell 1U host controller - but the connec |
|
| |
| 129823394909_572560007186 | linuxmania lizhi |
|
On Thursday July 13, linuxmania.lizhi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi all,
Im new to MD RAID. When I read the book "Understanding the Linux Kernel", I know that there are several layers between Fil |
|
| |
| 117928054396_573160007260 | Gordon Henderson |
|
Last year, there were discussions on this list about the possible
use of a co-processor (Intels IOP333) to compute raid 5/6s
parity data.
We are about to see low cost, multi core cpu chips with very |
|
| |
| 178422084956_570560007448 | Burn Alting |
|
|
|
| |
| 139924544189_582560007691 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
|
|
| |
| 145723354841_565660007390 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
|
|
| |
| 159727524729_550560007436 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 06:10 schrieben Sie:
Care to enlighten the rest of us what did the trick?
Dex
please disregard this email .. after doing more google research i have
re-assembled the |
|
| |
| 169126564240_508660007854 | Justin Piszcz |
|
On Tuesday July 11, pletopia@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Checksum : 4aa9094a - expected 4aa908c4
This is a bit scary. You have a single-bit error, either in the
checksum or elsewhere in the superbloc |
|
| |
| 134721714062_530360007711 | Jan Engelhardt |
|
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Neil,
It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how
come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l?
Is t |
|
| |
| 175222754164_594160007188 | Jan Engelhardt |
|
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Neil,
It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how
come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l?
Is t |
|
| |
| 163225584524_547360007977 | David Greaves |
|
|
|
| |
| 186328104729_559260007205 | David Greaves |
|
|
|
| |
| 102820054862_526960007248 | Vladimir Strycek |
|
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read
this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL?
GPL.
Ill make that |
|
| |
| 112324404420_518560007296 | Vladimir Strycek |
|
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read
this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL?
GPL.
Ill make that |
|
| |
| 189624954572_506060007673 | Mario BitKoenig Holb |
|
Hello Vladimir,
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote:
VS Hi,
VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical
VS 200GB hdd
VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks |
|
| |
| 124820674230_577260007443 | Mario BitKoenig Holb |
|
Hello Vladimir,
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote:
VS Hi,
VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical
VS 200GB hdd
VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks |
|
| |
| 174924034253_547860007568 | Neil Brown |
|
|
|
| |
| 168320244574_554560007667 | Tejun Heo |
|
|
|
| |
| 179424164107_521360007851 | Bill Davidsen |
|
On Tuesday July 11, htejun@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Christian Pernegger wrote:
The fact that the disk had changed minor numbers after it was plugged
back in bugs me a bit. (was sdc before, sde afte |
|
| |
| 150924984346_508160007782 | Justin Piszcz |
|
|
|
| |
| 175428074850_598460007389 | Justin Piszcz |
|
|
|
| |
| 142723274793_568060007789 | Christian Pernegger |
|
|
|
| |
| 124724884813_582260007106 | Molle Bestefich |
|
Hi!
I created a sw-raid md0 and a LVM above with four 250GB Samsung SATA
disks a couple of months ago. I am not an raid expert but I thought I
could handle it with a little help of my friends from g |
|
| |
| 148828274523_559560007124 | Henrik Holst |
|
Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich <at gmail.com writes:
From the paste bin:
443: root <at ned ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/sd[abcd]
Shows that all 4 devices are ACTIVE SYNC....
|
|
| |
| 144625494623_579260007180 | Karl Voit |
|
Henrik Holst <henrik.holst <at idgmail.se writes:
Karl Voit wrote:
[snip]
Well this is because of the false(?) superblocks of sda-sdd in comparison
to
sda1 to sdd1.
I dont |
|
| |
| 157323844987_542260007565 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 181227944893_560560007698 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 139327214186_520660007220 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 131220304046_583660007085 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
