SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Moto.wieszjak.pl - nowy wortal motoryzacyjny na rynku stawia na porady
Nowa witryna oferuje użytkownikom przegląd wiadomości z rynku motoryzacyjnego, testy aut nowych i używanych, liczne porady prawne i eksploatacyjne dla kierowców, moto-forum, niezbędnik oraz newsletter dla zmotoryzowanych.

 

120723544294_587960007386Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, sorry for my late answering - I was out for a few days. Since I do not have full insigight to neither the driver nor the internal connections of the board I need to guess. maybe the dri

 
176127624299_589160007318Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
151925394667_515160007452Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
196926214470_594860007317Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
179225854681_586660007650Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
149822784003_579360007107DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
117829184869_547860007248Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
179723274787_546360007040DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
191524474661_538560007656Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
170221874240_538360007312Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
103225514591_503560007749Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
114325224667_501160007475Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
125927974803_504660007281Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
108621744729_574860007123Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
140422614310_564560007363Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
195726774914_554860007256Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
129628564778_596360007778Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
143821274574_524060007834Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
152222604008_525060007568Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
137424124829_568560007473Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
104720134150_596260007863Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
121728584718_599660007585James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
177422584712_534760007886James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
118120194145_518960007153Udo van den Heuvel
On 10/23/06, James Olin Oden <james.oden at gmail.com wrote: I do believe we already have a patch where I work. Ill send it to the list in a moment. In need to hunt it down. If we dont hav

 
175826444566_558760007622Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1 for w83627hf to make my fans start again after booting the kernel on VIA Epia EK8000.

 
105923764635_521060007196Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:32:30 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1

 
107225554053_579160007874Roy Erickson
Jean Delvare wrote: If "sensors -s" is run as part of your init scripts, please remove it and check again, Id like to get it out of the list of suspects. $PSENSORS -s is in the lm_s

 
137623234131_508760007629Yongkui Han
Hello Roy, Please use the more decent subject. IM NOT SHOUTHING AT YOU too. Best would be to install the lmsensors package from your distribution. Become root. Run sensors-detect script which will d

 
197428534649_511960007920Message not availabl
Hi, I have an Intel D850MV motherboard. There is an ADM1025A sensor chip on the motherboard. Also there is an LPC47M142 I/O chip on the motherboard. My CPU is a Pentium 4 CPU, 1.7GHz. And her

 
127228004563_583860007892Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, Thanks very much for your help. Well always good to hear it. Unfortunately I have not so much free time recently for this kind of lm-sensors support stuff. The pin numbers for the

 
146024464267_509460007605Rudolf Marek
Hi Rudolf, I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU temp". It is about 20 seconds. In my opinion, the time constant of the silicon chip is about 10 millisecon

 
129127284159_534460007710Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Thank you for your reply. On 10/23/06, Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz wrote: Hi Yongkui I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU

 
121728954032_534860007704Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Forgot to include the attachment. Please check the attachment. Thank you! Yongkui On 10/25/06, Yongkui Han <hanyongkui99 at gmail.com wrote: Hi Rudolf, I drew the curve of

 
197829564556_562760007598Yongkui Han
I run the CPU burn benchmark for only 1 minute (plus 15 minutes system idle before running cpuburn, and 15 minutes system idle after cpuburn stops running), I even got the following message w

 
154623474398_510960007784Paul Aviles
Hello, I just installed a VIA Epia EK8000 board. It has w83697hf sensor chip, detected by sensors-detect. Temperature readings are high and do not move. Also changing set tempX Y to change diode, th

 
100126454229_526960007886Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:18:21 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: I have a weird question. The system I use are all the same, and one of them is really quiet and the others are somewhat louder in

 
187420304614_503260007132Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:31:55 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: Nice server.... [root at srv1 /]# sensors adt7463-i2c-0-2e Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480 ERROR: Cant get alarm mask da

 
174325914026_577560007008Rudolf Marek
Is this combination one of the ones thats not yet available? sensors-detect seems to work, but sensors says it cant find anything. Heres some output: [jhg at athena ~]$ lsmod|grep i2c i2c_i801

 
147929174964_503460007038Hans de Goede
Hello to the list. I have an HP Pavilion zv6069EA Laptop. Following your pages I succeeded in using i2c-piix4 with eeprom (but 1st question: what can I do now, since this is not a sensor?) and k8te

 
163320904385_503060007570Greg KH
Here are some hwmon fixes for 2.6.19-rc2. They have all been in the -mm tree for a while. Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/hwmon-2.6.git/ or from: master.ker

 
181522014214_504460007954Greg KH
From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Replace a bouncing email that I cannot recover from Mr Google. Signed-off-by: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <k

 
193023434984_554360007358Greg KH
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org The SMSC LPC47M112 Super-I/O chip appears to be compatible with the LPC47M10x and LPC47M13x as far as hardware monitoring is concerned. The device ID is

 
167521194949_570260007888Greg KH
From: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz Fix the detection of fan5 and preserve the bit between the register writes, because the bit is write only. Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at

 
171023734805_567460007348David Hubbard
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org Fix debug messages in w83781d at detection time. We cant use dev_dbg() on an i2c clients device before calling i2c_attach_client() on that client. Sign

 
171220414438_509660007638Christian Mahr
Hi David, On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:01:19 -0700, David Hubbard wrote: Im doing bits and pieces of the w83627dhg driver, and I want to make sure I test it on the latest patched w83627ehf driver. I be

 
166628874840_588160007309Hamlet
Hi Christian, You have a w83627dhg, if I remember correctly. The current driver you are probably using is the testing driver from the lm-sensors mailing list in September. Although it functions corr

 
183428604653_581860007029David Hubbard
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:55:10 -0300 Hamlet <hamletmun at fibertel.com.ar wrote: Winbond W83627DHG seems to be compatible with lm78 well, no not really.. the temp you get is MB temp, the cpu te

 
117520784148_512460007042David Hubbard
The patch will be for 2.6.19-rc2 or whichever kernel is the latest version. You should probably build a new kernel, as one of the things we would like to test is whether the patch compiles correctly

 
101224894416_581760007824Message not availabl
Hi Christian, Of yourse I can also test any newer version. I understand you want to make a separate driver for the W83627DHG for some 2.6.19-RC-xx? To be exact, the driver I sent you is for 2

 
116528744865_560460007937Christian Mahr
Hi Christian, Please include lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org in your reply so this will benefit others and get archived on the LM-sensors list. On 10/29/06, Christian Mahr <christian.mahr.ulm at ar